Dilema Politik dan Administrasi dalam Kebijakan Publik: Sintesis Literatur tentang Netralitas Birokrasi dan Intervensi Kekuasaan
Downloads
Hubungan antara politik dan administrasi merupakan isu fundamental dalam kebijakan publik, terutama berkaitan dengan netralitas birokrasi dan potensi intervensi kekuasaan terhadap proses administratif. Meskipun birokrasi dituntut untuk bekerja secara profesional, objektif, dan berorientasi pada kepentingan publik, perkembangan tata kelola pemerintahan menunjukkan bahwa politik dan administrasi memiliki keterkaitan yang kompleks dalam proses perumusan maupun implementasi kebijakan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mensintesis literatur mengenai dilema politik dan administrasi dalam kebijakan publik dengan fokus pada bentuk intervensi politik, mekanisme mempertahankan netralitas birokrasi, serta dampaknya terhadap kualitas kebijakan publik. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengacu pada kerangka PRISMA 2020. Artikel yang relevan diidentifikasi melalui basis data ilmiah dengan menerapkan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan sintesis tematik untuk menemukan pola dan hubungan antarhasil penelitian. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa politik dan administrasi tidak dapat dipisahkan secara absolut, tetapi perlu dikelola melalui batas kewenangan yang jelas, sistem merit, akuntabilitas, dan perlindungan profesionalisme birokrasi. Kontrol politik dapat memperkuat responsivitas demokratis apabila dilakukan secara legitimate, namun intervensi politik yang berlebihan berpotensi menyebabkan politisasi birokrasi, menurunkan kapasitas administratif, mengganggu konsistensi implementasi kebijakan, dan melemahkan kepercayaan publik. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa tata kelola pemerintahan yang efektif membutuhkan keseimbangan antara responsivitas politik dan profesionalisme birokrasi, dengan politik memberikan arah kebijakan dan birokrasi memastikan implementasi yang berbasis hukum, bukti, serta kepentingan masyarakat.
Åström, J., Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2022). Does policy influence hollow out public managers’ political neutrality? Administration & Society, 54(6), 1019–1044.
Blom-Hansen, J., Baekgaard, M., & Serritzlew, S. (2021). How bureaucrats shape political decisions: The role of policy information. Public Administration, 99(4), 658–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12709
Brierley, S., Lowande, K., Potter, R. A., & Toral, G. (2023). Bureaucratic politics: Blind spots and opportunities in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061621-084933
Callahan, R. F., & Mau, T. A. (2024). Reconceptualizing the politics-administration dichotomy to better understand public leadership in the twenty-first century: A multilateral actors model. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231213407
Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2022). Comparative bureaucratic politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-102543
Davidovitz, M., & Cohen, N. (2023). Politicians’ involvement in street-level policy implementation: Implications for social equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767211024033
Friedrich, L. (2025). Coping with political-ideological pressure: How street-level bureaucrats shield policy implementation from politicization. Governance, 38(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70052
Indiahono, D. (2022). Dynamics of bureaucratic neutrality policy in Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 18(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v18i3.1104
Jalonen, H. (2024). A complexity theory perspective on politico-administrative systems: Insights from a systematic literature review. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2333382
Kim, D.-R. (2020). Are politically neutral bureaucrats feasible in Korea? A critical understanding of political neutrality and political control. Korean Public Administration Review, 54(2), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.54.2.3
Lapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, bureaucratic legalism, and innovative attitudes in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13175
Lee, B. R. (2025). Political polarization, political neutrality, and the politicization of bureaucracy: Current status and challenges of political neutrality in the Korean bureaucracy. Korean Public Administration Review, 59(2), 33–70. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.59.2.33
Moynihan, D. P. (2025). Rescuing state capacity: Proceduralism, the new politicization, and public policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 44(2), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22673
Page, M. J. (2022). Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(2), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1535
Peters, B. G. (2022). Politicisation of the public service during democratic backsliding: Alternative perspectives. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12561
Rocha, V., Almendra, L., & Lotta, G. (2026). Politicization of street-level bureaucracy: Pressure in its various forms. Policy Making – Latin American Public Policy Review, 1(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.67312/policymaking.v1n1.a2
Sihaloho, N. T. P., & Herlan. (2020). Politicization of bureaucracy: The idea of strengthening ASN neutrality. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.213-224
Wiraganti, R. W., Santoso, A., & Aulia, A. H. (2025). Analysis of the politicization of regional bureaucracy on the neutrality of State Civil Apparatus performance. Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law, 6(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v6i1.39434
Copyright (c) 2026 Khairul Zaman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




