The Influence of the Use of Interactive Learning Media on Elementary School Students' Science Learning Motivation
Downloads
Learning motivation constitutes a critical determinant of academic success, particularly in science education at the elementary level (Madrasah Ibtidaiyah/MI). Despite its importance, conventional teaching methods often fail to adequately engage students and stimulate their intrinsic interest in science subjects, necessitating innovative pedagogical approaches. This study aims to determine the effect of interactive learning media on science learning motivation among MI students, comparing its effectiveness against conventional teaching methods in fostering student engagement and enthusiasm for scientific inquiry. The study employed an experimental research design utilizing a pretest-posttest control group configuration. The research sample consisted of two classes: an experimental group receiving instruction through interactive learning media and a control group taught using conventional methods. Learning motivation data were collected through a validated questionnaire instrument and analyzed using independent samples t-test to assess between-group differences in motivation levels. The findings revealed that the use of interactive learning media significantly increased science learning motivation among MI students compared to conventional instructional approaches. Statistical analysis demonstrated meaningful differences between experimental and control groups, with students exposed to interactive media exhibiting higher motivation scores across multiple dimensions including interest, persistence, and engagement with science content. Interactive learning media effectively enhances science learning motivation at the MI level, outperforming traditional teaching methods in stimulating student interest and enthusiasm for scientific learning. This study provides empirical evidence supporting the integration of interactive media into elementary science curricula. Theoretically, the findings reinforce constructivist learning principles emphasizing active engagement and multimedia stimulation in knowledge acquisition. Practically, educators and curriculum developers are encouraged to adopt interactive learning technologies as standard pedagogical tools to optimize science learning outcomes. Policy implications include institutional investment in educational technology infrastructure and professional development programs equipping teachers with competencies to effectively implement interactive media in classroom settings.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bajuri, D. (2022). Leadership motivation in efforts to improve employee performance at the Rajagaluh District Office. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 1(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.56916/ijess.v1i1.86
Daryanto. (2017). Learning media. Gava Media.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). The importance of autonomy for development and well-being. In Human autonomy in cross-cultural context (pp. 19–46). Springer.
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationship between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53–64.
Hafis, C., Ashari, A., & Ngazizah, N. (2022). Interactive multimedia based on science literacy and character for elementary school students. Edukasiana: Journal of Educational Innovation, 1(4), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v1i4.196
Hamalik, O. (2014). Learning media. Bumi Aksara.
Huda, M. (2015). Information and communication technology-based learning model. Pustaka Pelajar.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
Kozma, R. B. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. International Society for Technology in Education.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016a). Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 23 of 2016 concerning competency standards for graduates of primary and secondary education.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016b). Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 24 of 2016 concerning core competencies and basic competencies of subjects in the 2013 curriculum for elementary schools/Islamic elementary schools.
Nasution, S. (2016). Contextual approach in 21st century learning. Rajawali Pers.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Purnomo, A. (2018). Implementation of multimedia-based interactive learning media in elementary schools. Kencana.
Rivai, V. (2016). Information and communication technology-based character education. Kencana.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Sahno, S. (2022). The use of serial picture media to improve elementary school students' narrative writing skills. Edukasiana: Journal of Educational Innovation, 1(2), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v1i2.18
Sardiman, A. M. (2017). Interaction and motivation in teaching and learning. Rajawali Pers.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336.
Suparman, A. (2019). Interactive learning. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599–623.
Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nazarit Achwahyuni zarit, Hafidz Rosyidiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
