Volume 3 Number 7 July 2024 E-ISSN: 2963-2900 | P-ISSN: 2964-9048 https://jmi.rivierapublishing.id/index.php/rp
![]()
%204189-4197_files/image003.jpg)
Dynamics of Trust, Information Quality,
and Risk Perception in Online Purchasing Decisions
Ayu Widiya Astuti, Willy Arafah, Aji Mohammad
Fadrian Nur
Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta
Barat
Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the
influence of trust, information quality and risk perception on online purchase
decisions. This research is a quantitative research
with a research design using exploration. The population in this study is the
overall consumer of online shop services� in South
Jakarta. The sampling method in this study uses purposive sampling using the Roscoe (1975) approach in determining
the number of samples. The data analysis method in this study uses SEM-PLS.
Based on the results of the study, it was found that trust, information quality
and risk perception play an important role in influencing online purchase
decisions. It was also found that the perception of risk had a significant
negative effect on purchase decisions.
Keywords: Trust; Purchase
Decisions; Quality of Information; Risk Perception
INTRODUCTION
In recent years,
technology has been increasingly developed and more sophisticated than in
previous years. This technological development is felt in various fields.
Therefore, people's lifestyles are also growing and increasing along with
technological developments, one of the most striking is the use of gadgets that
tend to be used by some people to shop online or often called online shopping.
The condition of
people's behavior for online shopping is basically quite mushrooming. Not only
in the form of convenience factors felt by the public in online shopping, but
there are many factors that also contribute as one of the reasons for the
increasing intensity of people in online shopping. As reported by databox,
among the 10 countries with the highest percentage of e-commerce use, Indonesia
is in first place with a percentage of users, which is 88.1%. This shows that
88.1% of internet users in Indonesia already operate e-commerce services to buy
products online. In fact, according to the research results of the Katadata Insight Center (KIC) and Kredivo
(2021), it shows that generally Generation Z and millennials spend a lot of
their salaries shopping in e-commerce. Where around 3-5% of his monthly income
is used for shopping in e-commerce.
Based on the
Similar Web report� in the first quarter of the 2023
period, information was obtained that there are 5 e-commerce with the highest
level of visitors in Indonesia, namely: Shopee with 158 million visitors,
Tokopedia with 117 million visitors, Lazada with 83.2 million visitors, Blibli
with 25.4 million visitors and Bukalapak with 18.1
million visitors. Referring to the report, it can be said that Shopee is one of� the e-commerce that has a high enough market
share to be used as one of the platforms in online shopping.
According to Baskara & Hariyadi (2014) that an important factor that
affects online purchases is the ability of online stores to attract public
interest in the form of promotions and other forms shown to create good
impressions and experiences. Where the result of this experience is the existence
of consumer trust in online stores.
Trust is a
psychological area that is concerned with accepting things as they are based on
expectations of good behavior from others (Kartika & Gunawan, 2018). Trust is one of the psychological
factors in influencing consumer behavior. In online transactions, trust arises
when one of the parties involved has received certainty from the other party,
and is willing and able to provide its obligations. When someone shops online,
the main thing that a buyer considers is whether the website that provides
online shops and online sellers on the website can be trusted.
Trust positively influences the decision to shop online because consumers
are confident that the company is capable of carrying out its online activities
(due to competence) and can deliver the purchased products to the consumer (Iswara, 2016). If consumers trust the online store provided by the company, then it
allows them to increase their intention to make purchases online.
In maintaining long-term relationships with its buyers, online sellers
need to adhere to the concept of customer satisfaction (customer satisfaction). In order to
survive in the era of online shopping, online sellers must have loyal customers
(Customer Loyalty) who believe in the
excellence of online shopping services. This is in line with research Fivianty et al (2019) that trust has a positive and significant influence on purchase
decisions.
In addition to the
influence of trust, the decision to buy online shopping is basically also
supported by the quality of information provided by the online shopping website
itself. D'Alessandro, Girardi & Tiangsoongnern (2012) Explaining the quality of information is a function
that concerns the value of the information output produced by the system. The
quality of information is related to System Use, user satisfaction and
net benefits. Gaol
& Chen (2019) found that in the context of online
shopping, the information features of online shopping sites are an important
factor that determines consumers will make a purchase decision. This emphasizes
the importance of product information and user
quality interface in online shopping sites.
Choon
& Corresponding (2010) In his research, it is proven that
the quality of information also determines the purchase decision of the product
or goods. The quality of accurate information can provide customers with a
direct picture of the products being marketed. According to Choon
& Corresponding (2010) Up-to-date information can create
comfort for customers who want to continue to exist for products and goods in
marketing.
On online shop
sites, not a few fictitious online sellers
market fictitious products as well. A buyer must first check the
existence of an online seller. Usually on online shop sites, the site will
display information about sellers whose "stalls" are often accessed
by people. Buyers can take advantage of this information when they are going to
buy online. Virtual transactions are susceptible to fraud, which can cause
financial losses for online customers and is a financial risk that discourages
customers from making online purchases.(D'Alessandro et al., 2012); (Liu & Forsythe, 2021).
Therefore, the
risk perspective plays an important role in explaining online purchasing
behavior. The perceived risk of online transactions is the customer's
confidence about the potential negative consequences of online transactions (Luh Indiani, Rahyuda Nyoman & Yasa, 2015). Risk perception can be
interpreted as the uncertainty faced by a person, namely when they are unable
to predict the consequences that may be experienced from the decisions that
have been taken. Kirbrandoko (2013) Interpreting risk perception is a
person's subjective assessment of the likelihood of an accident and how worried
the individual is about the consequences or impacts caused by the event. Perceived Risk is the negative consequences that a
consumer anticipates related to the situation of purchasing a product. One very
important concept related to perceived risk is that the risk perceived
by a consumer, both its existence and its magnitude, is something very
subjective.
Pink & Father (2013) suggesting that internet consumer
trust and risk perception have a strong influence on their purchasing
decisions. Consumer disposition to trust, reputation, privacy issues, security
issues, the quality of Website information, and the reputation of companies,
has a powerful effect on Internet consumer trust in the Website. Pink & Father (2013) stated that perceived risk is an
important factor that affects consumers' online shopping purchase decisions.
According to Bianchi & Andrews (2012), a key factor, which continues to
be identified as a major obstacle to various forms of online consumer
transaction activity is risk perception. Where perceived risk (risk perception)
has consistently been identified as having a negative influence on online
behavior, including purchases (Bianchi & Andrews, 2012). In the online consumer behavior
literature, perceived risk is recognized as very important (D'Alessandro et al., 2012).
So it can be
concluded that consumer trust will be
formed if consumers get the information quality they need completely or
consumers have understood a purchasing system on a website. Based on the
description above which explains consumer confidence, information quality and
risk perception of online purchase decisions is an interesting thing to
research.
RESEARCH
METHODS
This research is a quantitative research with a research design, namely using
exploration. The
population in this study is the overall users� of online
shop services� in South Jakarta which
are infinite. The sample withdrawal technique in this study uses a
purposive sampling approach
�with
the characteristics of the respondents, namely (1) the sample in the study is
an online shop service user; and (2) has experience in making purchases at the online shop at least 2 times. As for the
determination of the number of research samples, the researcher determined the
number of samples which refers to the opinion of Roscoe (1975) that in mutivariate
research (including multiple regression analysis), the sample size should be 10
times the number of variables in the study, so that the sample size is
determined to be as many as 40 respondents. In this study, the data collection
method was carried out through the dissemination of questionnaires conducted
online through various social media applications. In this study, the data
analysis method uses SEM-PLS.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Based on the results of the outer model test,
it was found that there were several variable construction items that were
considered not to meet the criteria, so that in the research model, the
construction items were excluded in the research model. The results of the
outer model test on all variable construct items that have been validated, can
be seen more clearly as follows:
Table 1. Test Results Outer Model
|
Variable |
Items |
Outer Loading |
Composite Reliability |
Cronbach Alpha |
AVE |
|
Trust (x1) |
T1 |
0.908 |
0.919 |
0.882 |
0.741 |
|
T2 |
0.879 |
||||
|
T3 |
0.893 |
||||
|
Quality Information (x2) |
QI1 |
0.941 |
0.946 |
0.915 |
0.854 |
|
QI2 |
0.938 |
||||
|
QI3 |
0.893 |
||||
|
Perceived Risk (X3) |
PR1 |
0.932 |
0.928 |
0.896 |
0.764 |
|
PR2 |
0.884 |
||||
|
PR3 |
0.885 |
||||
|
PR4 |
0.788 |
||||
|
Purchase Decision (Y) |
PD1 |
0.904 |
0.919 |
0.882 |
0.741 |
|
PD2 |
0.929 |
||||
|
PD3 |
0.766 |
||||
|
PD4 |
0.835 |
2. Research
Results
Based on the
results of the research that has been carried out, the results of regression
estimation and hypothesis testing are found as follows:
%204189-4197_files/image006.jpg)
Table 2. Recapitulation
of Research Results
|
Hypothesis |
Orginal sample |
T Statistics |
P values |
Information |
|
H1 : Trust (X1) in Purchase Decision (Y) |
1.167 |
7.521 |
0.000 |
Hypothesis
Accepted |
|
H2 : Quality of Information (X2) towards
Purchase Decision (Y) |
2.180 |
4.235 |
0.000 |
Hypothesis
Accepted |
|
H3 : Risk Perception (X3) on Purchase Decision (Y) |
-2.220 |
3.593 |
0.000 |
Hypothesis
Accepted |
Based
on table 1 above, it can be explained that the testing of each research
hypothesis will be described as follows:
1. Consumer Confidence in Purchase Decisions
It was found that the coefficient value of the influence of consumer
confidence on purchase decisions was positive, which was 1,167 and the
t-statistical value was 7,521 with a significant level of 0.000 < α
0.05. So based on this, it can be stated that consumer confidence has a
significant positive effect on onlinepurchase decisions or in other words, the hypothesis proposed
is acceptable.
2. Quality of Information on Purchase Decisions
It was found that the coefficient value of the influence of information
quality on purchase decisions was positive, which was 2,180 and the
t-statistical value was 4,235 with a significant level of 0,000 < α
0.05. So based on this, it can be stated that the quality of information has a
significant positive effect on the decisionto buy online or in
other words, the hypothesis proposed can be accepted.
3. Risk Perception on Purchase Decisions
It was found that the coefficient value of the influence of risk
perception on purchase decisions was negative, which was -2,220 and the
t-statistical value was 3,593 with a significant level of 0.000 < α
0.05. So based on this, it can be stated that risk perception has a significant
negative effect on the decisionto
buy online or in other words, the hypothesis proposed is acceptable.
2. Discussion
The Influence of Consumer
Confidence on Purchase Decisions
Based
on the results of the study, it was found that consumer trust has a significant
positive effect on online purchase decisions. This indicates that trust plays
an important role in any decision making from consumers to shop online. The
higher the level of trust owned by a consumer, the greater the opportunity that
a consumer has to make a purchase on online services.
Where this trust refers to the availability of security guarantees in the form
of a warranty for products that are damaged at the time of receipt, the
existence of information provided for all problems that may occur at the time
of purchase and the suitability of the relevance of the information to existing
facts.
The
results of this finding are in line with the description presented by Lee (2014) that the consumer's perspective on
trust in online shopping plays an important role in determining the final
purchase decision of a consumer. Thursday & Zulkiffli (2020), there is a difference between a
person's trust in online transactions and their traditional trust. Where in the
context of online trust, a consumer will be faced with a condition to be able
to dare to accept the risk of the transaction made.
Online
trust describes the extent to which online consumers will accept vulnerability
and dependence on relying on the credibility, virtue, and competence of an
online vendor to deliver on its promises in the future (Jadil et al., 2022). Thus, the consumer's perspective
on trust tends to determine the final purchase decision between the buyer and
the seller (Gupta et al., 2009). According to Lee (2014), trust is even more important
online than offline retailers, as consumers see more risk in e-commerce due to
their inability to visit physical stores and check out the products they want
to buy. It plays a crucial role in determining online purchase intent (Hong & Cho, 2011) and spending decisions (Goritz, 2008).
Conversely,
lack of trust is the biggest barrier for consumers to make online transactions (Lorenzon, 2009). When fraud or a negative buying
experience occurs, the buyer creates a negative attitude (Rice & Post, 2014), they no longer trust sellers, and
they tend to turn to alternatives to fulfill their needs and desires (Lee, 2014).
The Influence of Information
Quality on Product Purchase Decisions
Based
on the results of the study, it was found that the quality of information had a
significant positive effect on the decision to buy online. The existence of
this significant positive influence indicates that online purchase decisions
are determined by the role of information quality owned by Shoppe which
includes accurate, timely information in conveying information and relevant in
providing information. The results of this study are
in line with the description by Widiyanto & Prasilowati (2015) That customer
satisfaction with e-commerce depends on three main qualities, namely
information quality, system quality and service quality. The quality of the
system depends on the needs of the user defined as an analysis and development
system. Some important factors in user purchase satisfaction with the website
include appearance, technical readiness, handling of navigation delays,
security, and privacy.
Information Products on online shopping include information on the
attributes of a product, recommendations from consumers, evaluation reports (Choon & Corresponding, 2010). The quality of
accurate information can provide customers with a direct picture of the
products being marketed (Choon & Corresponding, 2010). In addition,
up-to-date information can create convenience for customers who want to
continue to exist for products and goods in marketing (Choon & Corresponding, 2010).
Milan et al (2015) Posing that when
customers search on a website that they consider to provide high-quality
information, they understand that the website has a good layout and appearance,
where customers can easily find what they need and, for that reason, identify
that they can trust this website (Bart et al., 2005). How much useful and
appropriate information indicates whether the information presented in the
website is correct, i.e. if it meets the needs and can help customers (Chang et al., 2012). If the information is
useful to the customer, he or she will be more likely to trust the online
purchase website (Hsu et al., 2008), however, when a
customer sees evidence that the information is not secure or trustworthy, it is
likely that the customer leaves the website and is disappointed, which
anticipates or reinforces his or her distrust.
The quality of the website is very important, because in shopping
for online shopping activities, a person completely depends on the information
owned by the website so that consumers will trust. According to Sarwono and Prihartono (2012) in Widiyanto & Prasilowati (2015) stated that another
supporting factor that encourages consumers to carry out e-commerce activities
is website quality, the quality of a company's website must present the
company's presence in the eyes of customers virtually so that consumers become
confident and make transactions online through the company. Gregg & Walczak (2010) states that those who
have good website quality, even though they don't have
a good reputation, are more trusted than-sellers who have a good reputation,
but the quality of the website is bad.
Kurniawan (2018) Proving that consumers
need good website quality, by paying attention to the usability, information
and service interaction owned by the website to be able to encourage consumers
to make purchases.� The results of this
study also support the statement of Sarwono and Prihartono
(2012) in Widiyanto & Prasilowati (2015), a company's website
must present the company's presence in the eyes of consumers or customers
virtually so that they become confident in the credibility and professionalism
of the company so that consumers or customers become confident and make purchase
transactions to the company concerned. The relationship between website quality
and consumer purchase decisions also supports the results of research found by Satika (2016) in Kurniawan (2018) that the results of
their study said that variable X, namely website quality, had a significant
effect on variable Y where the variable website quality could explain the
purchase decision variable by 40.5%.
The Influence of Risk Perception on
Purchase Decisions
Based
on the results of the study, it was found that risk
perception has a significant negative impact on online purchase decisions. In
particular, the higher the level of risk perception that consumers have in the
context of online shopping, the lower their tendency to make online purchases.
These findings are consistent with a number of
previous studies that have highlighted the negative and significant influence
of risk perception on online purchasing decisions. These observations suggest
that factors that make consumers feel insecure or hesitant in the face of an
online buying environment can substantially inhibit them from engaging in such
transactions.
The importance of understanding risk
perception in the context of online purchases has proven relevant in
interpreting consumer behavior. The success of this research contributes to a
further understanding of the factors that influence consumer decisions in
today's digital era.
Perceived
Risk is the
negative consequences that a consumer anticipates related to the situation of
purchasing a product. One very important concept related to perceived risk is
that the risk perceived by a consumer, both its existence itself and its
magnitude, is something very subjective. The same buying situation, when faced
with two different people, can result in different risk perceptions. In
addition, the true or actual probability of a loss is irrelevant to a
consumer's reaction to risk, as far as past experience
is used as the basis for his current perception. Risk perception is a negative
perception of consumers in shopping that refers to negative results and the
possibility that these results will be real. Therefore, the most important
point that is relevant for a company is how to create a condition where the
consumer's risk perception is lower, so that consumers do not have more worries
about the transaction that will be carried out.
Luh Indiani, Rahyuda Nyoman & Yasa (2015) Positivity suggests that customers
seek more information for the sake of risk reduction, and therefore information
seeking is a strategy to lower purchase risk to a manageable level. Online
customers feel the need to gather more information than offline customers
before making a purchase (Ashraf, 2011).
Maulidiyah & Purwanti (2020) stated that a consumer's
perception of risk over online shopping can increase if: (1) the availability
of information about products is limited; (2) the product is a new product; (3)
low consumer confidence to evaluate products; (4) high product prices; and the
product is important to consumers.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the study,
it can be concluded that in the context of online purchase decisions, the trust
factor and the quality of information have a significant positive impact. This
means that the tendency of consumers to make online purchases is greatly
influenced by the confidence that consumers have in online e-commerce platforms
and the availability of access to accurate and useful information for
consumers. Meanwhile, the risk perception was found to have a significant
negative effect on online purchase decisions. The higher the level of risk
perception perceived by consumers, the lower their likelihood of making an
online purchase. Therefore, risk management and mitigation are key in designing
a successful online business strategy. Referring to the findings, the
researcher suggests for future studies to add variables of experience and
digital literacy as variables that moderate the relationship between risk
perception and online purchase decisions.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ashraf,
T. &. (2011). Enhancing Online Performance through Website Content and
Personalization. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(1).
Bart, Y., Shankar, V., & Urban, G. L. (2005). Are the
Drivers and Role of Online Trust the Same for All Web Sites and
Consumers ? A Large-Scale. October.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.133
Baskara, I. P., & Hariyadi, G. T. (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Kepercayaan, Keamanan, Kualitas
Pelayanan dan Persepsi Akan Risiko Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Melalui Situs
Jejaring Sosial. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 15(2), 79499.
Bianchi, C., & Andrews, L. (2012). Risk, Trust and
Consumer Online Purchasing Behaviour: A Chilean Perspective. International
Marketing Review, 29(3), 253�275. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331211229750
Chang, R. D., Fang, C. J., & Tseng, Y. C. (2012). The
Effects of WebTrust Assurance on Consumers� Web Purchase Decisions: An
Experiment. Online Information Review, 36(2), 218�240.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211229048
Choon, K., & Corresponding, L. (2010). The Effects of
Shopping Orientations , Online Trust and Prior Online Purchase Experience
toward Customers � Online Purchase Intention. 3(3), 63�76.
D�Alessandro, S., Girardi, A., & Tiangsoongnern, L.
(2012). Perceived Risk and Trust as Antecedents of Online Purchasing Behavior
in the USA Gemstone Industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics,
24(3), 433�460. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851211237902
Fivianty, N. P. A. D., Ni Wayan Eka, M., & I Gusti Ayu,
I. (2019). Pengaruh E-Servqual, Kepercayaan dan Persepsi Harga Terhadap
Keputusan Pembelian Online Produk Busana Melalui Media Sosial Instagram di
Kalangan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Mahasaraswati
Denpasar. Seminar Nasional Inobali, 477�482.
Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). Online consumer behaviour and
its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online
travel agencies in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4),
653�665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.001
Gaol, F. L., & Chen, E. (2019). The Influence of
Security, Trust, Service Quality and Risk Perception in B2C E-Commerce againts
People�s Online Purchasing Decisions (Survey on Customers of Tokopedia).
International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 124, 103�110.
https://doi.org/10.33832/ijast.2019.124.09
Goritz, O. B. B. & A. S. (2008). Perceived
trustworthiness of online shops. Jounal of Consumer Behavior, 50, 35�50.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cb
Gregg, D. G., & Walczak, S. (2010). The relationship
between website quality , trust and price premiums at online auctions.
Springer, Electron Commer, 10, 1�25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9044-2
Gupta, P., Yadav, M. S., & Varadarajan, R. (2009). How
Task-Facilitative Interactive Tools Foster Buyers � Trust in Online
Retailers : A Process View of Trust Development in the Electronic
Marketplace ଝ. Elsevier, 85, 159�176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2009.02.001
Hong, I. B., & Cha, H. S. (2013). The mediating role of
consumer trust in an online merchant in predicting purchase intention.
International Journal of Information Management, 33(6), 927�939.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.08.007
Hong, I. B., & Cho, H. (2011). The impact of consumer
trust on attitudinal loyalty and purchase intentions in B2C e-marketplaces:
Intermediary trust vs. seller trust. International Journal of Information
Management, 31(5), 469�479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.001
Hsu, W., Chen, M., Wang, T., & Sun, S. (2008). Coping
strategies in Chinese social context. 150�162.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00252.x
Iswara, D. (2016). Pengaruh Kepercayaan, Kemudahan, Kualitas
Informasi dan Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Studi Kasus pada
Pengguna Media Sosial Instagram di Kota Yogyakarta). Skripsi Program Studi
Manajemen Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016.
Jadil, Y., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022).
International Journal of Information Management Data Insights Understanding the
drivers of online trust and intention to buy on a website : An emerging
market perspective ☆.
International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100065.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100065
Kamis, F. F.,
& Zulkiffli, W. F. W. (2020). Online trust development
in online shopping. Journal of Information System and Technology Management,
5(18). https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.518003
Kartika, A., & Gunawan, H. (2018). Pengaruh Kepercayaan,
Kemudahan dan Kualitas Informasi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Daring di
Aplikasi Bukalapak pada Mahasiswa Politeknik Negeri Batam. Journal of Applied
BUsiness Administration, 2(1), 152�165.
Kirbrandoko, U. S. A. N. &. (2013). Analisis Proses
Keputusan Pembelian, Persepsi dan Sikap Konsumen Terhadap Beras Organik di
Jabotabek. Pangan, 22(2), 19�35.
Kurniawan, R. (2018). KEPERCAYAAN DAN DAMPAKNYA PADA
KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN PADA WEBSITE E-COMMERCE ( Studi pada Konsumen PT . B ).
Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 62(1), 198�206.
Lee, K. (2014). Predictors of Sustainable Consumption among
Young Educated Consumers in Hong Kong. 217�238.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2014.900249
Liu, C., & Forsythe, S. (2021). Post-adoption online
shopping continuance. March. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551011020110
Lorenzon, G. L. U. C. A. & A. (2009). Online Trust: State
of the Art, New Frontiers, and Research Potential. Journal of Interactive
Marketing, 23(2).
Luh, N., Indiani, P., Rahyuda, I. K., Nyoman, N., & Yasa,
K. (2015). Perceived Risk and Trust as Major Determinants of Actual Purchase ,
Transcending The Influence of Intention. 1, 1�13.
Maulidiyah, N.,
& Purwanti, L. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Risiko, Kepercayaan dan Keamanan
Terhadap Mina Beli Online Melalui Media Sosial (Studi pada Konsumen Online
Shop). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB.
Milan, G. S., Bebber, S., Toni, D. De, & Eberle, L.
(2015). Information Quality, Distrust and Perceived Risk as Antecedents of
Purchase Intention in the Online Purchase Context. Journal of Management
Information System & E-Commerce, June. https://doi.org/10.15640/jmise.v2n2a2
Widiyanto, I., & Prasilowati, S. L. (2015). Perilaku pembelian melalui internet. JMK, 17(2), 109�112.
https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.17.2.109