A REVIEW GEOSPATIAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
(GEO-AI): IMPLEMENTATION OF MACHINE LEARNING ON URBAN PLANNING
Cholid Fauzi
Politeknik Negeri Bandung
Email: [email protected]
|
Abstract |
|
Geospatial Artificial
Intelligence (Geo-AI) is an interesting topic in its development and
application in our lives. One of them is spatial planning, which contributes
to the economic and social development of a region or country. Spatial data
is the main thing in this research, which maximizes the effectiveness of land
use spatial data on the area as upstream data and develops GIS-based urban
planning applications to display the results of analysis and predictions of
urban objects automatically. On the other hand, to maximize tourism revenue,
the government plans urban areas for both spatial and land use and makes a
lot of spatial data based on geographical and environmental conditions. This
study will analyze the benefits of Geo-AI in urban planning and the tourism
sector. The method used in this study is the Systematic Literature Review
(SLR), where the search for the required articles comes from electronic
databases obtained using the NVivo software with article sources from Publish
or Perish. This study discusses the main steps for the analysis of geospatial
data that have been successful in the main areas, namely the development of
applications and models, including visualization. By treating issues in
geospatial artificial intelligence, the overall aim of the research is to
improve the quality of life for Indonesia's growing urban population. The
results of the study with the systematic literature review of Geo-AI found a
gap in the research implementation of the machine learning model used where
five models were compared and relevant to the geospatial dataset displayed in
the form of a literature review matrix and visually included in the relevant
keywords in the bibliometric analysis. Interdisciplinary results are
developing and are urgently needed by both government and private
stakeholders in the development of smart cities to prepare spatial planning
in urban areas and strategies in optimizing technology in the field of
spatial planning in implementing systems based on Geo-AI. Keywords: SLR. GIS.
Geospatial Artificial Intelligence. Geo-AI. Machine Learning. |
GeoAI, which is
a field that is constantly evolving and aims to assist in the processing and
spatial analysis of big data, can also be described as a new discipline that
combines innovations in spatial science, AI methods such as Machine Learning
(ML), and Deep Learning (DL), data mining (data mining), and high-performance
computing (high-performance computing. According to Gartner, GeoAI is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods,
including ML and DL (Pierdicca &
Paolanti, 2022), to
generate knowledge through spatial and image data analysis. The increasing
availability of geographic data, the development of AI, and the availability of
large computational capacities have all contributed to the increased
significance and potential of GeoAI. This concept is
fed into the larger AI framework as a sub-discipline of AI that uses machine
learning to extract knowledge from geographic data. Geo-AI now has an important
role to play in advancing traditional AI technologies and innovating new ways
to solve specific problems posed by the massive, complex, diverse and
ever-increasing nature of geospatial data, which is considered geo-referenced
data containing geotagging locations or position markers. Geospatial data is
widely used in many scientific fields and applications, including smart cities,
transportation, business, public health, public safety, resilience to natural
disasters, climate change and so on. The goal of tackling this problem is to
improve the quality of life of the world's growing urban population (Cugurullo, 2020). Various disciplines are involved in shaping this
interdisciplinary field, including computer science, geography, geographic
information systems (GIS), and urban studies. The purpose of this study is to
provide an overview of the main concepts surrounding the emerging field of GeoAI, Clarify the differences between GeoAI
and more general AI, and Integrate AI with GIS, making visualization and
software that have AI characteristics paramount. In addition, this study
discusses the main steps for geospatial data analysis that have been successful
in the main areas, namely application and model development, including
visualization. By addressing issues in geospatial artificial intelligence (Alastal & Shaqfa,
2022), the
overall aim of the research is to improve the quality of life for Indonesia's
growing urban population.
Previous research was obtained before doing SLR. Alastal and Shaofa (Abelha, Fernandes,
Mesquita, Seabra, & Ferreira-Oliveira, 2020) research an overview of GeoAI
technology, including the definition of GeoAI and the
differences between GeoAI and traditional AI. Key
steps to successful geographic data analysis include integrating AI with GIS
and using GeoAI tools and technologies. It also shows
the main areas of application and models in GeoAI, as
well as challenges to adopting GeoAI methods and
technologies and their benefits. This article also includes a case study of
using GeoAI in Kuwait, as well as some
recommendations. W. Li and C. Y. Hsu (Alastal & Shaqfa,
2022) research
based on various types of imagery or structured data, including satellite and
drone imagery, street views, and geoscientific data, and their application to a
variety of image analysis and machine vision tasks. While different
applications tend to use different types of data and models, we summarize the
six main strengths of GeoAI research, including (1)
enablement of large-scale analytics, (2) automation, (3) high accuracy, (4)
sensitivity in detecting subtle changes; (5) noise tolerance. K. Janowicz et
al. (Janowicz, Gao,
McKenzie, Hu, & Bhaduri, 2020) research on GeoAI for
geographic knowledge discovery, explains how changes in data are driving the
rapid growth of GeoAI and point out future research
directions. It also describes the development of spatially explicit models and
the sharing of high-quality geospatial datasets to advance GeoAI
research that can be reproduced in future research. The research is based on
two practical examples: how geospatial products can be generated in the
proposed architecture, how these products can be used in machine learning for
tactical planning, and how learned action courses and intelligence products can
be provided to planners in decision support.
A.
Identification
Significant work using SLRs in climate change studies was
carried out by Berrang-Ford (Berrang-Ford, Pearce,
& Ford, 2015). The authors adopted their recommendations for the SLR
primarily for outlining the research questions and objectives, selecting data
sources and documents, and analyzing and presenting results. The authors
conducted a layered literature review to determine the inclusion and exclusion
of findings that were more relevant to study publications using the Scopus
research engine by publication no later than June 26, 2023, with a period from
2019 to 2023. Scopus was chosen because it has the largest database of peer-reviewed
literature and the ability to search, find, and analyze. There is the first
stage, the author uses the key research terms Geospatial Artificial
Intelligence, Geo-AI, and Geospatial AI. The second stage involved exclusion
further to refine the results in the previous literature review (Berrang-Ford et al.,
2015). Exceptions include improvements to the field of study,
namely urban planning and tourism, as well as types of documents and titles of
sources that are not directly related to the topic. This resulted in 129
publications. The final phase involves excluding those studies on tourism and
urban topics that are covered under the topic of Geo AI in a very general scope
and that touch on tourism and urban planning issues rather than specifically in
Indonesia. Further exceptions are warranted when the author deems the scope too
broad.
B.
Screening
The author downloads the results in XML format, saves
them, and imports them into Nvivo. When importing into Excel, the author
selects all delimiters to make sure the information goes into the right
columns. However, the results are only sometimes consistent, requiring manual
checking of each entry line. The author found that the number of counts on the
author's publications and citations presented in the Scopus search sometimes
differed from the actual Excel sheet checks. Therefore, to ensure consistency, a
higher number of publications and citations was chosen. Results in Excel format
are checked line by line to determine exclusion from the list further. Finally,
there are 38 ingredients selected.
C.
Eligibility
In carrying out a qualitative synthesis in this stage
using the Matrix Framework, by coding or codifying each literature and case in
accordance with the findings related to the topics found, namely:
1.
Title
2.
Years
3.
Methods and Models
4.
Tools
D.
Included
(Meta-Analysis)
Geo-computation and Geospatial Artificial Intelligence
(GeoAI) represent innovative approaches that promote better Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) and Earth Observation. Geo-computation has the
advantage of using computational methods and tools to explore geospatial data
and earth data to generate new knowledge(Janowicz et al., 2020). Meanwhile, GeoAI provides learning algorithms and
techniques, such as machine learning, deep learning (Li, 2021), and knowledge transfer, to develop effective and
innovative solutions for geospatial and earth problems (PS Chauhan & Shekhar,
2021), (Pierdicca & Paolanti,
2022), (Liu & Biljecki, 2022). Mapping is an important component of GIS and earth
observation, which helps in understanding the natural and built environment.
Traditionally, spatial analysis based on spatial statistical inference theory
is used for mapping. Spatial analysis issues can be classified into the
following categories: identifying spatial patterns (Xu, 2021), exploring spatial factors(Liu & Biljecki, 2022), spatial simulation (Wen & Li, 2022), and geographic decision-making (Chadzynski et al., 2021). Despite differences in scope and focus, geo-computation
and GeoAI have significantly advanced methods of geospatial analysis and
mapping in recent years and have the potential to change the way we understand
and manage the complex interactions between human and natural systems.
Geo-computation and GeoAI have advanced approaches to
address complex geospatial and earth-related challenges. The integration of
advanced computing tools provides more opportunities for innovative
applications of geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) and earth
observation. These advanced computational tools include big data analysis (Song, Kalacska,
Ga�parović, Yao, & Najibi, 2023), cloud computing (such as Google Earth Engine) (Teja, Liu, & Chopra,
2023), graph knowledge (Nizzoli, Avvenuti,
Tesconi, & Cresci, 2020), GeoAI has become a driving force in advancing
geospatial data utilization. Even though the implementation of geo-computation
and GeoAI in mapping is growing, there is still a need to improve application
development from various perspectives. First, it is increasingly important to
understand the geospatial implications of the methods and results generated by
geo-computation and GeoAI, currently, from an algorithm or model perspective.
Geo-computation and GeoAI largely involve applying computational methods and
direct learning to geospatial data. This leads to a relatively simplified
integration of geospatial characteristics and spatial associations in models.
Traditional spatial analysis techniques make use of
various geospatial characteristics, such as spatial autocorrelation to measure
similarity between observations (Arundel, Li, & Wang,
2020), spatial heterogeneity to describe variations in
geospatial data across space, spatial singularity and spatial anomalies to
detect observations unusual and rare data and to measure similarity and
complexity of geospatial data
based on their respective geographic configurations. Although some recent
studies have characterized spatial dependence using the relationship between
data and their correlation (Wen & Li, 2022), the incorporation of these geospatial features still
needs to be improved. In addition, geospatial data is complex and diverse, with
sources and types as diverse as satellite imagery, aerial photographs,
photogrammetric data, geospatial data, and location data from social media
treated as samples or images like other fields, regardless of their geospatial
features. Special. As we know, geospatial data and geospatial data can
accurately describe geospatial information with various spatial types (e.g. points,
polylines, areas and grids) and at different scales, apart from the location
itself, such as longitude and latitude. Therefore, there is a need to integrate
these unique geospatial features into GeoAI algorithms and models to fully
utilize its capabilities in solving geospatial and geodata-related challenges.
SLR contains a review of GeoAI and a collection of case studies that have been
conducted, which have been classified into four categories: GeoAI Applications,
Spatial Analysis, Methods and Models in GeoAI, and Tools. This case review
categorizes applications in finding gaps in the GeoAI topic into these four
categories, giving the reader a clear understanding of the case or issue
presented in this study. In summary of the literature review
Based on the SLR process, selected articles are presented
in categories that have been determined based on the results of the review of
each article, in the article, there may be no mention of one of the categories,
and articles with grey shading are review articles of the same type as in table
1.
Table
1
Selected
articles based on the results of the review of each article
|
No |
Authors |
Title |
Year |
Method |
Models |
Tools |
|
2 |
Vopham T, Hart JE, Laden F, Chiang YY |
Emerging trends in geospatial artificial intelligence
(geoAI): Potential applications for environmental epidemiology
(VoPham, Hart, Laden,
& Chiang, 2018) |
2018 |
DL, ML |
feature recognition in historical maps, multi-sensor
remote sensing image resolution enhancement, and identification of the
semantic similarity in VGI attributes for OpenStreetMap |
Spark Hadoop |
|
3 |
Janowicz
K, Gao S, McKenzie G, Hu Y, Bhaduri B |
GeoAI:
spatially explicit artificial intelligence techniques for geographic
knowledge discovery and beyond (Janowicz et al., 2020) |
2020 |
DL, ML |
spatially
explicit models, question
answering, and social sensing, |
EarthCube, ESRI |
|
4 |
Liu P, Biljecki F |
A review of spatially-explicit GeoAI
applications in Urban Geography (Liu & Biljecki,
2022) |
2022 |
DL, ML |
Deep neural networks and spatially-explicit GeoAI |
ESRI |
|
5 |
Pierdicca R, Paolanti M |
GeoAI: A review
of artificial intelligence approaches for the interpretation of complex
geomatics data (Pierdicca & Paolanti, 2022) |
2022 |
DL |
networks
(DNNs), image segmentation model, Semantic segmentation, convolutional neural
networks |
red green� blue (RGB)
images, thermal images, 3D point clouds, trajec- tories, and
hyperspectral�multispectral images |
|
7 |
Chadzynski A, Krdzavac N, Farazi F, Lim
MQ, Li S, Grisiute A, Herthogs P, von Richthofen A,
Cairns S, Kraft M |
Semantic 3D City Database � An enabler for a dynamic
geospatial knowledge graph (Chadzynski et al.,
2021) |
2021 |
DL, ML |
dynamic geospatial knowledge graph |
|
|
8 |
Fischer MM |
Spatial
Analysis and Geo Computation: Selected Essays |
2006 |
ML |
spatially
explicit models |
CityGML
2.0 |
|
9 |
Yang C, Clarke K, Shekhar S, Tao CV |
Big Spatiotemporal Data Analytics: a research and
innovation frontier (Han, Liu, Sui, &
Zhou, 2021) |
2020 |
spatiotemporal framework, ML |
||
|
10 |
Wen R, Li
S |
Spatial
Decision Support Systems with Automated Machine Learning: A Review (Wen & Li, 2022) |
2023 |
AutoML, DL |
spatially
explicit models |
Satellite
imagery UAV
imagery Sensors Surveys Sociodemographic Simulations |
|
11 |
Song W, Keller JM, Haithcoat TL, Davis CH |
Automated geospatial conflation of vector road maps
to high-resolution imagery |
2009 |
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index |
spatially explicit models linear feature extraction |
MODIS, QGIS |
|
12 |
Wang S, Wang
E, Zhong Y, Yun W, Lu H, Cai W |
Geospatial
Big Data Analytics Engine for Spark (Wang et al., 2017) |
2017 |
ML |
FeatureRDD Spark |
SuperMap object
for Java and Apache Spark |
|
13 |
Gouriisankarrbhuniaa� H, Adimallaanarsimhaaeditors
P |
Advances in Geographic Information Science
Geospatial Technology for Environmental Hazards Modeling and Management in
Asian Countries Ethical Use Of Information
Technology In Higher Education |
|
|
spatially explicit models, mage segmentation model,
Semantic segmentation, convolutional neural networks |
|
|
14 |
Zhong Y, Li
J, Zhu S |
Clustering
Geospatial Data for Multiple Reference Points (Zhong, Li, & Zhu, 2019) |
2019 |
ML
Clustering |
APPROXIMATION
SEARCH ALGORITHM |
R |
|
15 |
Saldana-Perez M, Torres-Ruiz
M, Moreno-Ibarra M |
Geospatial Modeling of Road Traffic Using a
Semi-Supervised Regression Algorithm (Saldana-Perez,
Torres-Ruiz, & Moreno-Ibarra, 2019) |
2019 |
support vector machine method |
SVM regression, SVR regression |
QGIS, Python |
|
16 |
Jiang W, Zhang
L |
Geospatial
Data to Images: A Deep-Learning Framework for Traffic Forecasting (Arundel et al., 2020) |
2019 |
deep
learning |
Convolutional
Neural Network (CNN) and residual networks |
Historical
Average (HA) and AutoRegressive Integrated
Moving Average (ARIMA) |
|
17 |
Chauhan L |
Geospatial AI/ML Applications and Policies: A Global
Perspective |
2021 |
DL, ML |
|
|
|
20 |
Chauhan
LP, Shekhar S |
GeoAI -
Accelerating a virtuous cycle between AI and Geo (Alastal & Shaqfa, 2022), |
2021 |
DL, ML |
spatially
explicit models, image segmentation model, Semantic segmentation,
convolutional neural
networks |
SAGA |
|
23 |
Arundel ST, Li W, Wang S |
GeoNat v1.0: A dataset for natural feature mapping with
artificial intelligence and supervised learning [ |
2020 |
ML |
Classification, region-based convolutional neural
network |
GNIS Database, TerrainAI |
|
24 |
Mich L |
Artificial
Intelligence and Machine Learning |
2020 |
ML |
|
|
|
28 |
Li W, Hsu CY |
GeoAI for Large-Scale Image Analysis and Machine Vision:
Recent Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Geography (PS Chauhan &
Shekhar, 2021) |
2022 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
Cso |
Geospatial
analysis for Machine Learning in Tactical Decision Support (Xu, 2021) |
2022 |
ML |
Genetic
Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning |
spatial
data and satellite imagery |
|
30 |
Boulos MN, Wilson JP |
Geospatial techniques for monitoring and mitigating
climate change and its effects on human health |
2023 |
ML |
Spatial reasoning |
remote sensing data and satellite imagery |
|
31 |
Alastal AI, Shaqfa AH |
GeoAI
Technologies and Their Application Areas in Urban Planning and Development:
Concepts, Opportunities and Challenges in Smart City (Kuwait, Study Case) (Li, 2021) |
2022 |
ML DL |
Classification,
Clustering |
SAGA, QGIS,
Arcgis |
|
34 |
Cugurullo F |
Urban Artificial Intelligence: From Automation to
Autonomy in the Smart City |
2020 |
ML, DL |
Classification, Regression |
Arcgis ESRI, QGIS |
|
35 |
Abujayyab SK, Karaş IR |
Datasets
Structuring and Classification Tool: Case Study for Mapping Lulc from Rasat Satellite Images |
2019 |
ML |
Classification |
Arcgis |
|
36 |
D�llner J |
Geospatial Artificial Intelligence: Potentials of
Machine Learning for 3D Point Clouds and Geospatial Digital Twins |
2020 |
ML DL |
3D Point clouds |
Cesium,3D, CesiumJS |
|
38 |
Rocha TA, de Almeida DG, Kozhumam AS, da Silva NC, Thomaz EB, de Sousa
Queiroz RC, de Andrade L, Staton C, Vissoci JR |
Microplanning
for designing vaccination campaigns in low-resource settings: A geospatial
artificial intelligence-based framework |
2021 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
Alright M, Bitar H, Meccawy
M, Mullachery B |
Utilizing geospatial intelligence and user modelling
to allow for a customized health awareness campaign during the pandemic: The
case of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia |
2022 |
ML |
Classification |
ESRI ArcGIS |
|
40 |
Bhatti UA,
Yu Z, Yuan L, Zeeshan Z, Nawaz SA, Bhatti M, Mehmood A, Ain QU, Wen L |
2020 |
Geometric
algebra |
Clifford�Fourier
transform (CFT), quaternions (sub-algebra of GA), Clifford SVM and NNs |
Python |
|
|
42 |
Boulos MN, Peng G, Vopham
T |
An overview of GeoAI
applications in health and healthcare |
2019 |
MLDL |
Classification, Clustering |
|
|
43 |
Bordogna
G, Fugazza C |
Artificial
Intelligence for Multisource Geospatial Information |
2023 |
ML DL |
CNN,
RCCNN, LSTM, and GANs |
|
|
45 |
Li W |
GeoAI and Deep Learning (Li, 2021) |
2021 |
ML |
Generic ML Models |
|
|
46 |
Drishya Girishbai |
Future
road map for Geodata towards Geospatial Artificial Intelligence |
2018 |
ML |
�spatiotemporal data |
|
|
48 |
Nizzoli L, Avvenuti M,
Tesconi M, Cresci S |
Geo-semantic-parsing: AI-powered geoparsing by
traversing semantic knowledge graphs (Nizzoli et al.,
2020) |
2020 |
GSP (Geo Semantic Processing) |
Regression |
|
|
50 |
Dewandaru A, Supriana SI, Akbar S |
Evaluation
on geospatial information extraction and retrieval: Mining thematic maps from
web source |
2015 |
Geographic
Information Retrieval (GIR), ML |
the
nearest neighbour algorithm, SVM, linear
discriminant analysis |
QGIS,
Python |
|
52 |
Barrera-Narv�ez CF,
Gonz�lez-Sanabria JS, C�ceres-Castellanos G |
Geographic information systems and business
intelligence in decision-making in the tourism |
2020 |
ML |
Classification Clustering |
Python |
|
53 |
Selvaraj
MP, Pradeepa PV |
GeoSpatial Data
Analysis Using Markov Models |
2012 |
ML |
Markov
Models |
R, GEE |
�������������������
1) Visualization
Furthermore, this research will show how network
visualization, overlay visualization, and density visualization with the
keyword "GeoAI" can be seen in Figures 1, 2,
and 3.

Figures 1 Network Visualization
Figure 3 shows the existence of 10 clusters, which are
detailed in the table below, with the keyword "Machine Learning"
being mentioned the most at 17. The second position which is often mentioned is
"Deep Learning" 16 times. However, if you look closely, there are
similar keywords, namely GeoAI (14) and Geospatial
Artificial Intelligence (21). Other keywords that are closely related to
Geospatial and Artificial Intelligence have received many reviews, namely
Healthcare, Public Healthcare, Remote Sensing, and Sustainability. More details
can be seen in Table 2
Table 2 Keyword Clustering
|
Cluster |
Element |
|
1 |
Deep Learning, GeoAI,
Geospatial Artificial Intelligence, GIS, Machine Learning |
|
2 |
Climate Change, Geospatial Data, Healthcare, Public
Health, Remote Sensing |
|
3 |
Data, Data Mining, Geospatial |
|
4 |
Artificial Intelligence, Ontology, Sustainability |
Table 2 shows what keywords appear in searches
via VosViewer. If you look closely, there are several
technologies mentioned in relation to GeoAI, namely
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, GIS, and Remote Sensing. These three are
technologies that are considered important today. It has been proven that in
several applications, technology is the basis used in developing artificial
intelligence. An example is Machine Learning although several methods are
mentioned in the article (classification, clustering, etc.), what often appears
is Machine Learning. Also, from the table, several keywords are more related to
implementation, such as Healthcare, Public Health, and Sustainability. If you
look at the trend, there are lots of data sets used for Sustainability
monitoring.

Figures 2. Overlay Visualization

Figures 3 Density Visualization
Figures 2 and 3 show that there are still many
variables that are hot to be raised as research issues. Machine Learning and
Deep Learning are still the most discussed topics.
2) Gap Analysis
GeoAI topic according to the author, this topic is still in
the development and exploration stage of methods and models from ML and DL, so
there is still a gap in the GeoAI topic, but this is
one of the hottest variables to discuss, namely the gap between GeoAI and Sustainability and Ontology, there are still
visible gaps even though there seems to be a relationship.
There
were many inputs for researchers who would like to
be involved in the development of new machine-learning methods and techniques
in the future. For example, the development of a deep learning framework for
traffic forecasting, if further developed, will undoubtedly become the
state-of-the-art method for forecasting techniques based on geospatial data and
ultimately improve forecast accuracy. Therefore,
from this description, GeoAI will expand, and the proposals outlined by the
author will hopefully be implemented by researchers in the future.
Abelha, Marta, Fernandes, Sandra,
Mesquita, Diana, Seabra, Filipa, & Ferreira-Oliveira, Ana Teresa. (2020). Graduate employability and competence development in
higher education�A systematic literature review using PRISMA: Sustainability,
12(15), 5900.
Alastal, Abdelkhalek I., & Shaqfa, Ashraf Hassan. (2022).
Geoai technologies and their application areas in urban planning and
development: concepts, opportunities and challenges in the smart city (Kuwait,
study case). Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 10(2),
110�126.
Arundel, Samantha T., Li, Wenwen, & Wang, Sizhe. (2020).
GeoNat v1. 0: A dataset for natural feature mapping with artificial
intelligence and supervised learning. Transactions in GIS, 24(3),
556�572.
Berrang-Ford, Lea, Pearce, Tristan, & Ford, James D.
(2015). Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research. Regional
Environmental Change, 15, 755�769.
Chadzynski, Arkadiusz, Krdzavac, Nenad, Farazi, Feroz, Lim,
Mei Qi, Li, Shiying, Grisiute, Ayda, Herthogs, Pieter, von Richthofen, Aurel,
Cairns, Stephen, & Kraft, Markus. (2021). Semantic 3D City Database�An
enabler for a dynamic geospatial knowledge graph. Energy and AI, 6,
100106.
Cugurullo, Federico. (2020). Urban artificial intelligence:
From automation to autonomy in the smart city. Frontiers in Sustainable
Cities, 2, 38.
Han, Yue, Liu, Lin, Sui, Qiaoli, & Zhou, Jiaxing. (2021).
Big Data Spatio-Temporal Correlation Analysis and LRIM Model Based Targeted
Poverty Alleviation through Education. ISPRS International Journal of
Geo-Information, 10(12), 837.
Janowicz, Krzysztof, Gao, Song, McKenzie, Grant, Hu, Yingjie,
& Bhaduri, Budhendra. (2020). GeoAI: spatially explicit artificial
intelligence techniques for geographic knowledge discovery and beyond. International
Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 34, pp. 625�636. Taylor
& Francis.
Li, Wenwen. (2021). GeoAI and deep learning. The
International Encyclopedia of Geography.
Liu, Pengyuan, & Biljecki, Filip. (2022). A review of
spatially-explicit GeoAI applications in Urban Geography. International
Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 112,
102936.
Nizzoli, Leonardo, Avvenuti, Marco, Tesconi, Maurizio, &
Cresci, Stefano. (2020). Geo-semantic-parsing: AI-powered geoparsing by
traversing semantic knowledge graphs. Decision Support Systems, 136,
113346.
Pierdicca, Roberto, & Paolanti, Marina. (2022). GeoAI: A
review of artificial intelligence approaches for the interpretation of complex
geomatics data. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems,
11(1), 195�218.
PS Chauhan, Lokendra, & Shekhar, Shashi. (2021).
GeoAI�Accelerating a Virtuous Cycle between AI and Geo. 2021 Thirteenth
International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3-2021), 355�370.
Saldana-Perez, Magdalena,
Torres-Ruiz, Miguel, & Moreno-Ibarra, Marco. (2019). Geospatial
modelling of road traffic using a semi-supervised regression algorithm. IEEE
Access, 7, 177376�177386.
Song, Yongze, Kalacska, Margaret, Ga�parović, Mateo,
Yao, Jing, & Najibi, Nasser. (2023). Advances in geocomputation and
geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) for mapping. International
Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, p. 103300.
Elsevier.
Teja, Kamurthi Ravi, Liu, Chuan Ming, & Chopra, Shakti
Raj. (2023). Water Assessment Using Geospatial and Data Science Tools. 2023
International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI),
1�6. IEEE.
VoPham, Trang, Hart, Jaime E., Laden, Francine, & Chiang,
Yao Yi. (2018). Emerging trends in geospatial artificial intelligence (geoAI):
potential applications for environmental epidemiology. Environmental Health,
17(1), 1�6.
Wang, Shaohua, Zhong, Yang, Lu, Hao, Wang, Erqi, Yun,
Weiying, & Cai, Wenwen. (2017). Geospatial big data analytics engine for
spark. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Analytics for Big
Geospatial Data, 42�45.
Wen, Richard, & Li, Songnian. (2022). Spatial Decision
Support Systems with Automated Machine Learning: A Review. ISPRS
International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(1), 12.
Xu, Qiang. (2021). Evaluation of Rural Tourism Spatial
Pattern Based on Multifactor-Weighted Neural Network Algorithm Model in Big
Data Era. Scientific Programming, 2021, 1�11.
Zhong, Ying, Li, Jianmin, & Zhu, Shunzhi. (2019).
Clustering geospatial data for multiple reference points. IEEE Access, 7,
132423�132429.